So, what is a Strategic Meetings Management Programme (SMMP), why is it important and how are they changing the way large
organisations plan, measure and control their meetings?
In truth the principles of SMMP have been around for some time but only in the past few years has the process been articulated and
benefits more widely understood. A great
place to start if you want to understand SMMP is the recent HBAA white paper,
available at http://bit.ly/VHtwpb
The HBAA report (for obvious reasons) focuses largely on the
contribution of specialist meetings management agencies and procurement
professionals. However, at the risk of
upsetting these important and influential vested interests, I want to establish that any
successful strategy must serve the interests of the meeting ‘owner’ and their
audience not the intermediaries, their job is to facilitate the process and add value.
There is an absolute requirement for good practise but the tendency
toward mediocrity that an inflexible, commoditised process, designed to make life easier for the agents and accountants must be
resisted.
So, what can meetings profession learn from TripAdviser and the Totnes Story?
You may have seen recently that the coffee drinkers of Totnes successfully appealed to mega brand Costa Coffee to stay out of town in
defence of their independent local coffee shops. Whilst I am not suggesting
that the independent venue sector needs protection I do think that a debate
needs to be had about how best to serve meeting planners when developing
processes such as SMMP.
The job of procurement is to save cost and the job of agents
is to book the best venues but both of these roles should remain subordinate to the
needs of the meeting planner. If this were
indeed the current situation how can it be that SMMP ‘preferred supplier’ lists are dominated
by the major hotel brands and based on special commissions, volume incentives and availability of automated booking processes?
This may sound like sour grapes from the CEO of an
independent venue group but I offer in evidence the proof that independent
venues consistently score higher than the big brands in the approval ratings of
event hosts.
The only independent, benchmarked, national event feedback
system (which compares 20 meeting venue categories and brands and has collected
many thousands of client reports) consistently scores the big brands
significantly lower for ‘Net Promoter’, Overall Satisfaction and Value for
Money. In spite of this clear preference, strategic
meetings management programs and the large agency policies and processes push
ever increasing volumes of corporate meetings to the big brands.
It’s time that these programmes take user feedback on board
if they are going to deliver the best results for their meetings. Agents and procurement professionals need to
realise that they are driving commoditisation, mediocrity and supplier consolidation. To maintain healthy
competition and improvement in quality they have a responsibility to support
variety. Consolidation of suppliers will work against
them in the future. Without realising it, the agents are facilitating their own demise, if they cannot add value to their clients by their specialist knowledge of niche providers because they have killed them off they will soon be bypassed - hotel big brands will be only too pleased to deal direct with corporate procurement.
Meeting planners need to learn from the coffee drinkers of
Totnes and take back the control of venue selection but they also need to have
access to the data about venue performance, maybe it’s time for a meetings equivalent
of TripAdviser?
Its interesting to see what affect TripAdviser has had on
the individual traveller market and the choices those buyers have.
If you go to the hotel feedback site and look at the rankings
for any town or city it soon becomes obvious that people prefer the service and
value for money they get from independent and boutique hotels. Good independent and boutique hotels are thriving. This is now driving
the big brands to launch small scale brands that try to emulate the personality of their successful competitors. Choice is undoubtedly
increasing.
In case of a corporate event, the scenario is totally formal and the entire atmosphere is different than other events.
ReplyDeleteatlanta meeting venue